Robotic integration

Custom robotic integration, built for packaging

A robot on its own does not pick, pack or palletize anything. Odecopack integrates the robot with the tooling, vision, safety and controls that turn it into a working cell — scoped to your product, your rate and your line. We are a FANUC Authorized System Integrator.

Below: the robot classes we integrate, what "integration" actually includes, and the packaging applications each one fits.

FANUC SCARA robot with mechanical gripper integrated into a packaging cell
Robot partner
FANUC Authorized System Integrator
Robot classes
Articulated · SCARA · Delta · Collaborative
Built in house
Tooling, panels, programming
Delivered from
Hockley, TX · installed across the US
The short answer

What robotic integration actually means

Custom robotic integration is the engineering of a complete work cell around a robot, not the purchase of the robot itself. The robot arm is a general-purpose motion platform — it cannot pick a specific product, tell one orientation from another, or talk to the conveyor beside it until someone engineers those things around it.

That engineering is what determines whether a cell works: the end-of-arm tooling that actually touches your product, the vision or guidance that tells the robot where the product is, the safety system sized to how the cell is guarded, and the controls integration that lets it talk to the equipment already on your line.

Odecopack integrates robots as a FANUC Authorized System Integrator, with mechanical, electrical and robotics engineers in house — the same team that designs the tooling programs the robot and builds the panel, so nothing gets lost between disciplines.

Choosing a platform

Robot classes we integrate

The right class is picked against payload, reach, speed and floor space — not defaulted to whichever robot we have on hand.

Articulated robots

Best for

Palletizing, depalletizing, case loading, heavier or irregular payloads

Four to six axes of motion, the widest reach and payload range of any robot class we integrate. The default choice when the product varies in size or orientation, or when the cell has to reach around obstructions instead of straight down.

SCARA robots

Best for

High-speed pick and place, kitting, carton erecting on a fixed plane

Fast, precise and rigid on a horizontal plane, with less reach than an articulated arm. Right when the motion is repetitive and mostly horizontal — picking from a fixed infeed and placing into a fixed pattern, over and over, quickly.

Delta / parallel robots

Best for

Very high-speed light picking, small or delicate products

The fastest cycle times we integrate, at the cost of a small payload and a limited working envelope. Earns its place on lines picking dozens of small items per minute, where an articulated arm would be the bottleneck.

Collaborative robots

Best for

Machine tending, low-volume cells, shared space with operators

Lower speed and payload than an industrial arm, traded for reduced guarding and the ability to share space with people. The right answer when floor space, changeover flexibility or operator interaction matters more than raw rate.

Beyond the robot

What "integration" includes

End-of-arm tooling

The gripper is usually what decides whether the cell actually works on your product. We design and build EOAT in house — vacuum, mechanical, magnetic or combined — instead of treating it as an accessory to the robot.

Vision and guidance

Cameras for locating, orienting or inspecting product before the robot commits to a pick, integrated with the robot's own coordinate system rather than bolted on as an afterthought.

Safety and guarding

Guarding, light curtains and safety-rated controls sized to a risk assessment for the specific cell — different for a fenced articulated arm than for a cobot sharing space with an operator.

Controls and line integration

The robot controller talking to your PLC, your upstream conveyor and your downstream equipment, on the protocol your plant already runs. A robot that cannot talk to the rest of the line is not an integrated cell.

For the full engineering picture — PLC integration, control panel assembly, motion control and vision as standalone capabilities — see custom automation.

Where it runs

Packaging applications

Palletizing and depalletizing
Building or breaking down pallet loads at the end of the line, sized to your case dimensions, pattern and pallet height rather than a fixed catalog envelope.
Depalletizing and repalletizing cells
Case packing and loading
Grouping and loading product into cases or trays, including products that are too fragile, too irregular or too variable for a fixed mechanical loader.
Pick and place
Moving product between stations — infeed to tray, tray to case, line to inspection — at the rate your upstream process actually produces it.
Kitting and assembly
Combining multiple components into a single kit or sub-assembly in one cell, instead of running several manual stations to get the same result.
Machine tending
Loading and unloading another machine — a case erector, a wrapper, a scale — so an operator is not standing at it for a repetitive load/unload cycle.
Before you spend anything

When robotic integration is the right answer

Integrate a robot when

The product varies
Size, orientation or weight that changes SKU to SKU is exactly what a programmed robot handles and a fixed mechanism does not.
Several stations should become one cell
Picking, orienting, inspecting and placing combined into a single integrated cell instead of separate machines with handoffs between them.
The layout is unusual
An odd footprint, a low ceiling or an obstruction a fixed-motion machine cannot reach around, but an articulated arm can.
You need one cell to do more than one job
A robot reprogrammed for a new SKU or a new task is usually cheaper than a second fixed machine for that task.

Consider a standard machine when

The motion is simple and fixed
A single repetitive motion on one product, at one rate, is usually cheaper and simpler with fixed mechanical automation than a robot.
The rate is very high and the product is uniform
Above a certain speed on a single, unchanging product, purpose-built mechanical automation can outrun a robot cell on cost per unit.
The volume does not justify programming and tooling
Robot integration carries EOAT design and programming cost up front. On very low volume, that cost may not be worth carrying.
See our work
FAQ

Robotic integration questions