How does automated palletizing reduce labor costs?

Automated palletizing removes the hours people spend stacking cases by hand on every shift. The saving is those hours multiplied by the fully loaded labor cost, less the machine's maintenance. For example, one person stacking on each of two 8-hour shifts, five days a week, is about 4,000 hours a year — roughly $112,000 at $28 an hour loaded.

How long does it take for a palletizer to pay for itself?

It depends on the hours displaced and your labor cost. Using the default assumptions in Odecopack's palletizer ROI calculator — one person per shift, two 8-hour shifts, $28/hour loaded, installation at 20% and maintenance at 3% of equipment price — a robotic palletizer pays back in about 23 months and a gantry palletizer in about 14 months. These are estimates to size a project, not a quote.

Does an automated palletizer eliminate the palletizing job?

It eliminates the repetitive stacking, not the need for a person. Someone still supervises the cell, supplies empty pallets and slip sheets, removes finished loads and clears faults. The person who used to stack by hand, who already knows the product, is a natural fit for that role.

How do automated palletizing systems compare to manual palletizing?

Manual palletizing has low up-front cost but a recurring labor cost on every shift, a pace that varies with fatigue and staffing, and pallet quality that depends on who built the load. Automated palletizing costs more up front, then runs a consistent programmed pattern at a steady pace and removes the dependence on filling a hard-to-staff position.

What are the common challenges when implementing a palletizing system?

The most common are overestimating the labor hours the machine will displace, not planning floor space for the cell and its pallet positions, inconsistent case infeed, choosing a machine before the heaviest case and full SKU list are known, and not planning operator training. Each is avoidable if it is scoped before the machine is chosen.

Can automated palletizing also increase throughput?

It can, mainly by keeping pace for the whole shift. A manual stacking position slows with fatigue, breaks and staffing gaps, while an automated palletizer is designed for continuous operation. Whether that raises line output depends on whether palletizing was the bottleneck in the first place.

Palletizing labor cost

How to reduce palletizing labor costs

The short answer

Automate the stacking. An automated palletizer removes the hours people spend building pallets by hand on every shift, so the saving is those hours times your fully loaded labor cost, minus maintenance. One person on two 8-hour shifts is about 4,000 hours a year — roughly $112,000 at $28 an hour.

Calculate your payback See the worked example

Robotic palletizer stacking cases at the end of a line

By Odecopack engineering. We build the palletizers this page mentions, so read it as informed and interested — every figure below comes from our published prices and our own calculator.

A worked example

What automated palletizing saves on a two-shift line

Calculated with the default assumptions of our palletizer ROI calculator. Change any of them to your own numbers there — the model is the same.

People stacking per shift: 1
Shifts per day: 2
Hours per shift: 8
Days per week: 5
Loaded labor cost: $28/hour
Installation: 20% of equipment price
Maintenance: 3% of equipment price per year

Gantry palletizer

From $99,000 + installation

Estimated payback

14 months

Investment: $118,800
Labor saved / year: $112,000
Maintenance / year: $2,970
Net saving / year: $109,030

Gantry palletizer details

Robotic palletizer

From $165,000 + installation

Estimated payback

23 months

Investment: $198,000
Labor saved / year: $112,000
Maintenance / year: $4,950
Net saving / year: $107,050

Robotic palletizer details

Beyond the wage

Where manual palletizing labor cost actually comes from

The worked example only counts hours. These are the costs it leaves out — which is why it is a conservative estimate.

Hours, on every shift

Stacking cases by hand takes a person for the whole run, on every shift the line runs. That time — at the fully loaded rate, not the wage — is the cost automation removes.

Turnover and rehiring

Repetitive lifting is among the hardest end-of-line jobs to keep staffed. Every departure brings recruiting, onboarding and a slower new hire.

Overtime when you're short

When the palletizing position goes unfilled, someone covers it — usually at overtime rates, or by pulling a person off another station.

Strain and injury exposure

Lifting and twisting with loaded cases, hour after hour, is exactly the kind of work that produces strain injuries and the costs that follow them.

Inconsistent loads

Hand-built pallets vary by person and by hour of the shift. Uneven loads shift in transit and turn into damaged product and claims.

Also facing a labor shortage?

When the problem is filling the position at all, not only its cost, our article on palletizing automation and labor shortages goes deeper.

Read the article

Side by side

Manual vs automated palletizing

Comparison of manual and automated palletizing
Aspect	Manual	Automated
Labor per shift	One or more people stacking for the full shift	An operator supervises, loads pallets and clears faults
Cost profile	Recurring: wages, benefits, overtime, turnover	Up-front equipment and installation, then maintenance
Pace	Varies with fatigue, breaks and staffing	Steady, designed for continuous operation
Pallet quality	Depends on who built it	Same programmed pattern every time
Staffing risk	Line slows or stops when the position is unfilled	Not dependent on filling a hard-to-staff role
Flexibility	Any pattern, any product, immediately	New patterns are programmed; heavy cases need the right machine

Before you buy

Common palletizing implementation challenges — and how to avoid them

Savings that don't materialize

The business case assumed a full position would go away, but the hours displaced were smaller than planned.

Build the case on hours actually spent stacking today, per shift. If the machine would displace half a shift, the payback may not work — better to know before buying.

Floor space

The palletizer, pallet positions and guarding don't fit where manual stacking used to happen.

Lay the cell out on your real floor plan early. A gantry palletizer's footprint is its frame, which makes it simpler to place.

Inconsistent infeed

Cases arrive crooked, touching or at irregular spacing, and the palletizer spends its time recovering.

Treat the infeed conveyor as part of the palletizer project, not something that was already there.

Case weight and pattern changes

Heavier SKUs or new pallet patterns show up after the machine is chosen.

Scope against your heaviest case and your full SKU list. Our gantry handles up to 65 lb; heavier cases call for a robotic palletizer.

The people side

Operators aren't trained, or the displaced workers are simply laid off and the knowledge leaves with them.

The person who stacked by hand already knows the product and the patterns, which makes them a natural choice to run the cell. Plan the training into commissioning.

When margins are the problem

The lowest-cost way to start automating palletizing

If manual palletizing labor is eating your margin and the budget is tight, start with our gantry palletizer: from $99,000, built for low- to medium-speed lines with cases up to 65 lb, simple to run and nearly maintenance-free. Move to a robotic palletizer, from $165,000, when cases are heavier or the line is faster.

Starting prices exclude installation and apply to customers in the United States; the gantry price is for a single-pallet configuration with standard safety.

Gantry palletizerFrom$99,000Up to 65 lb · low to medium speed Robotic palletizerFrom$165,000Higher payload · faster cycles

FAQ